Showing results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Communication with same LN/Net address/Driver name

  1. #1

    Ausrufezeichen Communication with same LN/Net address/Driver name

    Hello Support,

    I have more than 10 substations separately working fine,and each have almost same IED (relay) communicating over IEC 61850, Each substations have almost same I/Os.  In each substations/IED LN, net address &
    driver name are same as compared to other stations, only IP address are different. Now we want to connect a ring network & connect each substation in a ring loop.  My doubt is, it will communicate or there will be issue.
    Because All LN, net address & driver name are same.
    Thank you.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    01.07.2008
    Location
    Salzburg, AT
    Posts
    971

    Default Re: Communication with same LN/Net address/Driver name

    There will be NO problem because of such similarities. In IEC 61850 protocol the client-server communication (MMS) is pear-to-pear, so as long you are not trying to connect with 2 different IEDs having exactly the same IP address and IP Port, there would be no conflicts. So you can for sure communicate with e.g. 1000 absolutely identical IEDs, via drivers with same names and/or Net Address settings, if only IP address of IED is unique in the scope of TCP Network.
    And - if you are not trying to configure in one driver instance two connections with the same Net Address setting.

    In zenon project - if you decide to place all 10 substation projects into single Integration project (do you?) - this will also work. So even if your substation projects have variables with the same names - the integration project is distinguishing variables via prefix with project name. Note: zenon Editor forces the use of projects with different names; thus unique.

    Example: assuming you have 10 identical substations, each substation contains 50 IEDs and own zenon project. zenon Projects are made as copies of the same first project:
    - project names: SUB_A, SUB_B, ... etc.; in zenon Network settings configured to use different PCs names as 'Server' (primary network server and standby), the rest of project identical.
    - driver in a project: 'IEC61850 driver' with connections numerated using 'Net Address' 1 to 50; each to IED with different IP address.
    - variables in a project: IED01_Mod_stVal, IED02_Mod_stVal, ... etc.; with identical 'Symbolic Addresses' (and 'Net Address' 1 to 50).
    then you can place all those projects as sub-projects in an I-Project, e.g. project with name "RING" (typically 'standalone', without own process drivers).


    An eventual conflict in the ring (but not related to iec850 driver in zenon) could be then only on GOOSE, depends on IT infrastructure. GOOSE is the multicast, not peer-to-peer, thus each IED sending GOOSE (publisher) in the same domain/VLAN, has to use unique APPID number. Else the GOOSE subscribers get problem to handle in general, or to handle fast enough, received messages.
    Eventual performance issues in the IT infrastructure?
    Last edited by ursulak : 29th June 2018 at 10:16

  3. #3

    Daumen hoch Re: Communication with same LN/Net address/Driver name

    Thank you Ursulak,  for your quick and valuable response...   Now its clear.



Similar Threads

  1. S7TCP Driver IP Address
    By ronmany in forum Drivers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 9th November 2020, 19:15
  2. Windows driver communication problems
    By xandit in forum Drivers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 31st January 2020, 11:37
  3. Windows driver communication problems
    By xandit in forum zenon Service Engine Supervisor
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11th January 2018, 17:36
  4. IEC60870 Driver Communication Status
    By knubla in forum zenon Energy Edition
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 29th November 2012, 13:32
  5. IEC60870 Driver Communication Status
    By knubla in forum Drivers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 29th November 2012, 13:32

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •